Quote from: turvarya on September 03, 2015, 01:21:07 PM

Quote from: cryptodevil on September 03, 2015, 01:04:43 PM

Quote from: Devianttwo on September 03, 2015, 07:17:12 AM

I screwed up and made a very VERY bad judgement call.

Screwed up? Judgement call? "Hmmmm, should I download those child abuse images?" Is not a 'judgement call' type of question for anybody who isn't a twisted fucked-up excuse for a human being.

You're only sorry you got caught, shitbag.

Quote from: Devianttwo on September 03, 2015, 07:17:12 AM

I screwed up and made a very VERY bad judgement call. I am a God loving man and I always have been. I know my Lord will protect me through this hard time. Goodbye my friends and my God Bless each and every one of you.

Fuck you and your 'God'. I'm sure you'll quickly find the rest of the child-abusing scumbags huddled in the prison yard in their 'prayer circle', roundly declaring themselves 'healed' of the 'sin' and no longer under the control of 'satan', because you lot don't exactly do intellectual honesty, which is why you love yourself so much Gawd. You get to play-pretend *real* fucking hard and convince yourselves that Gawd has forgiven you and how you're not going to make the same 'mistake' in future, again. Each time.

Aha, I see 'Swordsoffreedom' is flying that bullshit 'Getting off on abusing children is just the same as being Gay' twisted 'justification'. Please explain how two grown adults having consensual sex, irrespective of their gender, is *anything* like an adult abusing his position of power to betray children for his selfish sexual gratification.

I'm eager to hear your sound explanation for why your buddy, the pedophile, is just being unfairly treated, you know, what with how teh gheys trample on your right to hate that they demand to be treated as equal human beings.

There is a big difference between abusing children and looking at pictures of (abused?) children.
And yes, I know the ramification of "without demand there wouldn't be supply" etc., but it is still not the same. So, if you want to argue, argue about the crime he actually committed.

Heh I was waiting for that troll bait
IT's CALLED NAMBLA
They both started in this together its just that one got scaled up and the other faction had to abandon their roots and switch to pure condemnation for them.
I'll even link it up for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association
http://www.voiceofrevolution.com/2011/11/15/the-pedophile-elephant-in-the-gay-activist-closet/
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/03/28/_be_they_gays_be_they_nambla_be_they_people_who_believe_in_beastiality.html

Didn't say it was = just saying that assaulting the pillars of society is annoying all around we could have a whole argument on the definition of produced/drawn/voyeur/3d/jailbait/non-nude/models etc and the legal stances on each but that is not what a Scam accusation thread is for.

CARSON: Well, my thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a woman. It's a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality. It doesn't matter what they are. They don't get to change the definition. So it's not something that is against gays, it's against anybody who wants to come along and change the fundamental definitions of pillars of society. It has significant ramifications.

(Love who they want is the Gay motto just poking at the foundations of the LGBT/Gay Rights movement and throwing it under a scrutiny bus)
http://jimdaly.focusonthefamily.com/shouldnt-people-be-allowed-to-love-who-they-want/

--

Quote from: TeamButtcoin on September 03, 2015, 12:46:10 PM

Quote from: Swordsoffreedom on September 03, 2015, 08:37:51 AM

Well with modern society and its liberalization of the gay community despite vast protest for their lifestyle and the act of sodomy in general, I can see that point of view of being a bit light being fair as I will equate the dang two things as equal (lol off topic).
Only one has the pocketbook while the others have no collective organization.

No, the difference is that gays don't have 'victims'. Pedophiles do. This shouldnt be hard to understand

Fair enough was just poking a bit at cryptodevil there, but to address your other point their are victims in that society as a whole has to adopt policies that may be unfair towards those whose opinions are in disagreement, why else would their be debates about a Christian not being able to bake cakes and closing his shop because of gay rights, educational reform in Ontario forcing children to learn about LGBT issues without proper discussion from parents first, or arresting individuals for not providing marriage licenses in Kentucky to LGBT couples based on personal and state beliefs just to name a few not even getting into adoptions.

Another issue would be the Bus Driver who refused to drive a LGBT themed Calgary Transit bus because it interfered with his own personal beliefs on this issue, not that he was not willing to provide the service but he did condone the theming of the bus itself and then having his life and job sabotaged by those who are angry that he voiced a contrary opinion to this issue.
http://calgaryherald.com/news/traffic/ride-with-pride-calgary-transit-unveils-rainbow-bus-for-pride-parade
https://www.advocate.com/religion/2015/09/03/canadian-bus-driver-refuses-work-citing-radical-sexual-movement
"Employees have rights too, including the right to religious views that seem objectionable and difficult to fathom."

(The difference here between the other cases is that it was the transit authority that authorized and promoted this as an independent impartial public service the LGBT community did pay for the advertising but unlike lets say a divorce billboard on the side of a bus) the bus was rainbow colored saying it is a public duty when a group forces it on the employee is not equivalent in society to having a choice in the matter and being prosecuted for it.

A significant portion of transit customers, and perhaps drivers, would undoubtedly feel uncomfortable on this bus. This might be a feel-good experience for some but in reality anyone not supportive of the pride movement is being made to feel excluded by a city agency they pay taxes for. If there is any place where statements like this should have no place it is on public services.

The victims are diverse but they are not as directly attributable to a single cause as that between a pedo and a kid, he-he if people wanted to start a firestorm then we would need to talk about consent and what can be defined as consent, as well as levels of love and different types of relationships to define what is healthy historical precedents etc but that would bring in feminist arguments about victimization what does it mean to be a victim and what would be considered a healthy relationship, ha-ha sorry just having a bit of fun this threads pretty amusing.

To sum it up there is a point where it just becomes incendiary, where the LGBT community is just trying to create controversy to victimize themselves so when you say there are no victims I disagree there are victims it's just not as clearly connected and that shouldn't be hard to understand.
--
As an aside how is this a Scam Accusation again ?
Move to Off-Topic , sum it up No Scam was performed here however a persons character was put into question and while that does qualify as a reason for people to avoid trading with the person no money was stolen nor was their any intent to steal Bitcoin that I can see.