Quote from: adamstgBit on September 04, 2015, 06:31:17 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on September 04, 2015, 06:23:37 PM

Quote from: Peter R on September 04, 2015, 06:19:27 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on September 04, 2015, 05:58:26 PM

The hardcoding of a blocksize is part of consensus just as they are running the same codebase overall. I question the wisdom of making that part of the code at all. However, it seems that having no limit could be problematic, and as Panther pointed out, miners do want some predictability, which is why I'm liking Bip100 more. Do you know if Jeff Garzik ever considered making it a 51% vote?

Sickpig suggested that the block size limit was a transport layer constraint that crept into the consensus layer. I agree. I don't think we really need a protocol enforced limit because:

1. There is a significant economic cost to producing large spam blocks as an attack.

2. There is a physical limitation to how large a block can be (due to bandwidth and other constraints).

3. The miners can enforce an effective limit anyways.

BIP100 seems redundant (and dangerous if it's not based on majority votes). Let's get rid of the limit and let the miners sort it out.

Ok cool. Let's.

Is there a BIP for this?

If not, can we create one?

bitcoin no limit! fuck ya! miners would simply always include some maximum amount of TX to make sure other miners accept it and keep mining on top of it.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposals

Quote

People wishing to submit BIPs, first should propose their idea or document to the mailing list. After discussion they should email Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>. After copy-editing and acceptance, it will be published here.

We are fairly liberal with approving BIPs, and try not to be too involved in decision making on behalf of the community. The exception is in very rare cases of dispute resolution when a decision is contentious and cannot be agreed upon. In those cases, the conservative option will always be preferred.

Having a BIP here does not make it a formally accepted standard until its status becomes Active. For a BIP to become Active requires the mutual consent of the community.

Those proposing changes should consider that ultimately consent may rest with the consensus of the Bitcoin users (see also: economic majority).

No limit is the most guaranteed way to turn Bitcoin into Govcoin and Peter knows this.