Quote from: Panthers52 on September 05, 2015, 08:21:45 PM

The first poster has absolutely no ethics nor morals. He has stolen money from at least one website, and is advertising another casino that is clearly a scam. He does not care about warning others, in fact he is strongly against the warning of others about potential scams.

The purpose of the first poster creating this thread is to sling QS and myself's reputation through the mud because QS had called him out as a thief and because I had disagreed with him. This is not the first time that TSP has claimed that users who disagree with him are an alt of someone calling him a scammer, but you do not need to take my word for it, you only need to take a look at this thread, more specifically, look at TSP's reaction when someone agreed with $username. What did TSP do? He claimed the persons agreeing with $username was one of $username's sock-puppets.

One of the users who correctly said that TSP is a scammer is bitcointalk.org moderator Mitchell. Over a year later TSP started using a sock-puppet account to pressure Mitchell to take down a paid advertisement on a thread that he was spending a portion of his limited and valuable time maintaining. Here is an example where TSP was being especially an asshole to Mitchell:

Quote from: DiamondCardz on January 20, 2015, 08:33:48 PM

Quote from: sed on January 20, 2015, 01:24:09 PM

Quote from: Mitchełł on January 20, 2015, 08:04:11 AM

Hello everyone,

Sorry that I haven't posted anything here lately, but my internship is consuming almost all of my time. These are the final two weeks, so things are getting busy and stressful for me. Rapports have to be written, code has to be checked, presentations have to be made, etc.

I will try update the OP somewhere this week, but please don't expect anything, because I can't promise you an update. After these two weeks it will be smooth sailing, but for now, please bear with me.

My opinion: I would bear with you a lot more happily if you'd take that advert of the front page. As long as you're selling this thread, you should keep it up to date and not complain or say things like "don't expect anything". If the advert is gone, then everything you said is very reasonable. Again, just my opinion.

That's...the most dickhead thing I have heard someone say on this forum this month.

Donations amount to almost nothing for this thread, I'll bet. And he gets around 0.02 BTC every 10 days from the ad. That's hardly reimbursement for his time anyway. It's not even intrusive.

@TSP - Can you explain your months-long harassing behavior towards Mitchell as being anything other then retaliation for Mitchell agreeing that you are a scammer? If this cannot be properly address, or is ignored, then the preponderance of evidence will show that TSP harassed Mitchell for months in retaliation for calling him a scammer.

The reason TSP does not like QS is not as clear cut as it initially appears. QS had purchased advertising from Mitchell several times, and this was advertising revenue that TSP did not want Mitchell to have. TSP even went as far to start to troll QS in a signature campaign that QS was acting as escrow for.

Quote from: TSP April 09, 2015, 06:14:04 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.msg11034617#msg11034617

Quote from: Quickseller on April 09, 2015, 11:14:17 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.msg11030388#msg11030388
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

This is quickseller from bitcointalk.

The escrow address for the bitcoinpoker.ag signature campaign is : 1NPDJ8gmNbZd2QimaQzbFBmGUtCX5djgrC

This is in reference to the thread located: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0

As long as there are funds in the escrow address to cover payment to all participants then it is safe to wear the signature.

Thank you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVJmgLAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWHecIAKxHQ3404g0I2CUz01MqKyJN
yt6vrYF5ssnuUuSIPfpHggxczhTZAIr3abWHidp++QpNQS1/nPYEAmyJUGHRaXXx
TaQHNjVSLFltZnG6kPtsO9AnbADv9UhQM3jKVMIGHoUEE1sEpthcaUzdoM9ImpUM
g31T4uC2U8OG1sZZi1aMljT3M88YjbJuSOkluf3bYuQSwfJfosE8zliZ7U/fqZhP
U6v6kr6+QtEvQz+iqap3v3wIxzbxeK+VKSP7YmrC//DFzbqOtLHri9bb0JIYj9h+
0TDkAna4iy4FK+gZGxH0h2fshc0aZuJVX43cS2jimb3Nt3Z2H8g+JKtcUObzk4E=
=WlZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

This is quickseller from bitcointalk.

The escrow address for the bitcoinpoker.ag signature campaign is : 1NPDJ8gmNbZd2QimaQzbFBmGUtCX5djgrC

This is in reference to the thread located: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0

As long as there are funds in the escrow address to cover payment to all participants then it is safe to wear the signature.

Thank you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVJmgLAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWHecIAKxHQ3404g0I2CUz01MqKyJN
yt6vrYF5ssnuUuSIPfpHggxczhTZAIr3abWHidp++QpNQS1/nPYEAmyJUGHRaXXx
TaQHNjVSLFltZnG6kPtsO9AnbADv9UhQM3jKVMIGHoUEE1sEpthcaUzdoM9ImpUM
g31T4uC2U8OG1sZZi1aMljT3M88YjbJuSOkluf3bYuQSwfJfosE8zliZ7U/fqZhP
U6v6kr6+QtEvQz+iqap3v3wIxzbxeK+VKSP7YmrC//DFzbqOtLHri9bb0JIYj9h+
0TDkAna4iy4FK+gZGxH0h2fshc0aZuJVX43cS2jimb3Nt3Z2H8g+JKtcUObzk4E=
=WlZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hi Quickseller, how can we verify your PGP message (without knowing your PGP public key)? Also, I think the point of the signed message from the escrow is usually to prove that you control the bitcoin address associated with the escrow. So, I think you ought to sign a message using the private key of 1NPDJ8gmNbZd2QimaQzbFBmGUtCX5djgrC so that we can verify that you control the address.

I love PGP but in this context we aren't trying to verify your identity, we want to verify that you control the funds.

Quote from: TSP April 09, 2015, 07:20:52 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.msg11035305#msg11035305
[...]
Quickseller, do you control 1NPDJ8gmNbZd2QimaQzbFBmGUtCX5djgrC ?

I'm quite surprised that what I said is in anyway controversial. It seems quite straightforward to me.

The above might seem like a reasonable inquiry upon an initial review, however there are two points that should be made:
#1) TSP was not participating in that paid signature campaign, and this fact means that he really does not have standing to question how the escrow is working. If this was the only issue, I would give him a pass, but it is not.
#2) The escrow that TSP had started participating in prior to making the above inquiry used a similar PGP signed message to confirm the receipt of funds (except this PGP signed message did not even control an address in which he was holding funds):

Quote from: TSP March 03, 2015, 07:55:14 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973949.msg10646213#msg10646213
Ok, I'm in!

Name: tspacepilot
Post count: 1714
BTC address: 1PtuuKPwm9nmmFEyvnJBsqfjn51uHjTqda (same as in profile)

I have added your signature and I await confirmation of my enrolment. Thanks for the opportunity!

Quote from: sed March 11, 2015, 01:49:06 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973949.msg10646213#msg10646213
Ok, I'm in!

Name: tspacepilot
Post count: 1714
BTC address: 1PtuuKPwm9nmmFEyvnJBsqfjn51uHjTqda (same as in profile)

I have added your signature and I await confirmation of my enrolment. Thanks for the opportunity!

Quote from: Devthedev March 03, 2015, 10:08:22 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973949.msg10647762#msg10647762
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I will be providing escrow services for the DaDice signature campaign.
I am in possession of 8BTC for the first week, and dadice has stated that he or she will be refilling the address weekly.
ndnhc will be managing the campaign and will be maintaining a list of enrollees for payment each Tuesday.
Upon verification of the spreadsheet, the enrollees will receive payment to the address provided.

No more than 7.4BTC will be released to campaign members weekly.

Hero/Legendary/Staff Members: 20*.0015*100 =3
Senior Members: 20*.0013*100 =2.6
Full Members: 20*.0009*100 =1.8

The escrow fee for this signature campaign is 3%

Let me know if you have any questions, I'm looking forward to working with each of you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.8
Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto

wsBcBAABCgAGBQJU9jDJAAoJEFkJihs2GslbSNgIAKXyiAKkt61b5f2fFpjXUMbz
H1/TyXoeSWsixCZ9qRYZZFYIol4vudaVW647dTCLLaSVfSqzOlCX8nMNPiDBUDLx
X5p9hEtIVDBsQgQdJaIoeMeitscZqhUjDpVSvMZE9tAlKU9dByt/sQiRara+sPu5
dDwpqnDL03wI6KhWu0d9fMsbdHdoM2cvOKudjzcJ2bjnRowaTnjdvGyRD5jRtpx7
5azwEFAMKv3C9KS+KU8t/ki1JW/EGTX/VTDAV4baBv8xNwTwd2kXXUUBLzEK6sxz
PeTlLSQphXMMarFv8067uSey1byr5+vfYBSFBekzno+hZ1//RNFBjUrfLk4ZF0o=
=p0+B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

@TSP - Why exactly were you trolling QS about signing a message from a bitcoin address he was holding funds in for a signature campaign when the escrow for your very own signature campaign was holding funds in the exact same way? Was this because QS had done business with Mitchell in the past who had previously called you a scammer? If you cannot address this issue, or if you ignore this issue then the preponderance of evidence will show that you chose to harass QS because he did business with someone you did not like, and was making your overall harassment less effective.

#One additional point to add regarding this is that TSP has often advocated that DaDice is a legitimate company despite their refusal to provide any kind of evidence of controlling the amount of money they claim to control. @TSP - Can you explain why you would trust a brand new user with zero prior reputation to claim they have over a hundred thousand dollars worth of bitcoin, when you did not trust someone who has been around a while and had some number of successful trades?

TSP has also used a number of obvious shill accounts in order to make both QS and myself look bad. TSP also used at least one shill account to attempt to scam me.

Quote from: brin999 on September 04, 2015, 08:30:56 PM

Looks like you are just throwing shit at a wall to see what sticks are you jealous that quickseller is on the default trust list and you are not this proves how much he derserves it and not you

Quote from: Danksagung on September 04, 2015, 08:43:37 PM

please show more respect for quickseller,
he tries so hard to keep us all safe.

Both of these are brand new accounts with only one post. After the first account posted, I had initially thought that this was a reputable member telling TSP that he is butthurt without risking that he get trolled and harassed. However once the second account posted, it became more apparent that TSP was using brand new accounts to make a very weak argument against TSP that should have looked like QS was using sock-puppet accounts.
@TSP - do you really think your argument was so weak that you needed to use additional sock-puppet accounts in order to further the reputation of both QS and myself? I am certain you are going to deny this, so I will say that this activity just makes you an asshole.

Some of you reading this may wonder what exactly this has to do with me. Not long ago, I was critical of TSP's opinion that others should not be warned about Maidak, who has credible scam accusations against him totaling thousands of dollars. He later followed up with me via PM asking me to delete the critical comments against him, and asked that I post in his meta thread against QS. I told him that I wanted to avoid the drama even though I think he is a scammer. We then went back and fourth via PM with him making very vague arguments that really did not make any sense to me, and I eventually ended it with that it is not my job to get him to agree that he is a scammer.

TL;DR - TSP is someone who will troll, and harass you if you disagree with him, or if you do business with someone that disagree with him. I would warn anyone reading this post to stay far away from TSP and avoid interacting with him at all costs because you never know if you will accidentally say something that he disagree with.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

~the only Panthes52

@TSP - is there a reason why you have not responded to any of my concerns? I know these are very tough questions for you to answer, and I know these questions make you look very bad, but my questions are very valid and do have to do with your overall intentions here.