April 20, 2015:TSP opens a thread in Meta
complaining QS on a signature campaign thread about signing a bitcoin message from the bitcoin address he claimed to be holding money in. QS had previously signed a PGP message saying almost the exact same information as the message in the signature campaign TSP was participating in.
Over 11 days pass!April 20, 2015:TSP opens a thread in Meta
complaining that QS was engaging in trust abuse. It appears that QS had removed the negative trust rating and then put it back on, so I am not quite sure as to what date it was originally put on, however I have no reason to believe it was any date other then this same date.
Something's wrong with your timeline. There aren't 11 days between April 20 and April 20.
If you read what I wrote, you would see that the exact same thing was posted on both "April 20th"'s. There was 11 days between when TSP started trolling QS, and when QS gave TSP a negative rating.
I think if QS had signed a message with the address he claimed to control this would have ended. It's standard practice to do so, why wouldn't QS do it?
That is something you would need to ask QS. I did give an
example of a case when this was not done. This is an example where TSP would have a legitimate reason to be concerned about actual possession of money because a portion of the money in question was going to be due him.
If you really want me to answer why QS did not sign a message, then he might have taken from the
allmighty dooglus:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=717300.msg8253439#msg8253439I woke up this morning to find an email from support at dicebitco.in asking if I would be willing to escrow another 5 BTC for them for the sig campaign.
I agreed, gave them 18KSgPcNRPi9K4bp91Vb3pVNygPon4y5Pw as the address to send the coins to, and they sent 5 BTC.
Here's the transaction ID:
https://blockchain.info/tx/f329fda96936bdb136bc5cebe56d201b19f579e8730f2880e4c96344e0fa08d1The address is actually an address in the Just-Dice hot wallet, which is still being used to allow people to withdraw from the site (I use it as my day-to-day web wallet), so it's possible the coins will move before the end of the month but don't worry - I have other coins offline to replace them with if I need to.
I can sign a message saying "dooglus owns this!" with that address if that helps, but so could whoever really owns it (if you're the suspicious type) so I don't see that it really proves anything. My post here should be enough, right?
More specifically
I can sign a message saying "dooglus owns this!" with that address if that helps, but so could whoever really owns it (if you're the suspicious type) so I don't see that it really proves anything. My post here should be enough, right?
It seems that legendary signature campaign manager dooglus never signed a message from the escrow address.
It also said that you have other coins to replace them with if they were lost/spent.
Tspacepilot also posted several times in that thread, but never asked you for a signed message. Why do you think that is? FYI - he did have standing to ask because one of his alts was going to receive payment from the signature campaign (unlike the one he was trolling QS in).
I understand that you are strangely backing tsp blindly, but I really do not think this is a good approach. Why are you so interested in this case anyway? There are plenty of other scammers who cry trust abuse that you take no interest in. Seems suspicious to me.
TSP is not even sure that he is right about me and QS being the same person.
Why don't you help us out. Are you and QS the same person or not?
I have answered this question before, and answering it again is only going to result in my words getting twisted by tsp (and maybe you).