Quote from: Hazelnut on September 07, 2015, 03:55:50 AM

Quote from: Blazedout419 on September 07, 2015, 03:49:26 AM

Quote from: Hazelnut on September 07, 2015, 03:42:55 AM

Quote from: xetsr on September 07, 2015, 03:36:20 AM

He explained it better here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171059.msg12348272#msg12348272

You believe that? have you considered the possibility that he made that up to try and get out of a tight corner? Or is your faith in him is so absolute that you are incapable of thinking for yourself?

This thread has been fantastic. It shows how far otherwise trustworthy people would bend their morals rather than admit that they were wrong in their judgement (TC, Blazedout419, Blazr, xetsr). Credit to Vod for being able to see this with an open mind. If anything it would have been easy for him to fall in the same pattern as you as he is tageted so much.

How have I bent my morals exactly? I clearly stated that escrowing for yourself would be wrong. I can not say that Panthers and QS are one in the same. Please explain where I have done something that is even slightly immoral.

In a neutral position you would've looked at the situation and evaluate. In this case your belief in QS makes you arrive at

Quote from: Blazedout419 on September 07, 2015, 02:16:04 AM

Ah good I really did not think he would do that as he knows better.

even though he hasn't said that clearly. The irony in this situation is that you believe in QS, and he fooled you into giving him feedback on two accounts, essentially abusing your default trust position. I am sure if you didn't have full faith in him you would have realised all this long back.

The feedback he earned from me was not from any sort of abuse. Read the post I made that you have quoted... "looks to me he did said no." - I replied to that statement. This is why I try to avoid replying in these type of threads. I have nothing to even do with this situation...yet sock accounts are trying to drag me into it and question my morals Roll Eyes