Quote from: tspacepilot on September 07, 2015, 04:11:33 AM

Quote from: xetsr on September 07, 2015, 04:00:55 AM

What I am sure of is TSP's algo / script proves nothing and he's basically doing the same thing he claims QS did to him. Not sure why nobody else sees that though so maybe I'm wrong.

Now there I think you're going a bit too far. I agree that everyone should evaluate the evidence I presented for themself and I'm not going back on that. But I think if you say that it "proves nothing" then you're missing the fact that .5 million words of text is not easily come by, and statistical analysis of a corpus that size isn't something that you can just write off as irrelevant.

I also think it's in no way fair to suggest that I'm doing to him what he's done to me. I'm not on default trust and I don't want to be put there. I do think that people on default trust should not be using it to attack people for personal grudges. QS has attacked me with 4 different account now and has repeatedly attempted to smear me off of the forum. I've done nothing but to try to stand up for myself against a bully.

When it turns out that this bully is providing himself escrow services and I come across hard, quantitative evidence of it and I present it to the public, that's in no way the same thing as using some power that I have (I'm not on default trust, I have no power in the current system) to defame someone. I have presented my evidence and I ask others to decide what to think. QS has done quite the opposite to me, he neg-repped me without presenting any evidence and when he finally presented his "case" literally everyone is telling him to drop it. He left a default trust rating on me and refuses to change it despite the consensus of his peers that he should do so. I have no default trust rating to leave and I merely present some facts I uncovered and I ask you all to judge. There's a big difference there.

I did go a little far there, I'll edit that. Like I mentioned before though, that script could easily flag someone wrong and you know how people are very quick to call scam around here. People should use their heads, but it would be much easier for them to believe what a script is telling them. Just like how some blindly follow those with trust, no questions asked. Two very different things but you get what's I'm trying to say?

At the moment, you've done very little to test it out so how do you know that's not a false positive? QS or someone else will just bring this up later.