Quote from: dyask on September 07, 2015, 12:23:36 PM

Withdraws were broken for at least two weeks. They have been working now for a couple of weeks. While the withdraws were broken there was two separate things that happened.
1) Some disappeared. A message on the site says a bug was found and audits are being done and those withdraws are being credited back to peoples accounts. I have heard on chat that it has happened. I didn't have that problem so I can't say more.
2) Many withdraws were credited back to accounts after a week and the autobuy feature was enabled on all accounts at about the same time. That happened twice.

Now withdraws are working, but very slow. I've had 3 paid since the withdraws started working. So you were incorrect in saying the site is broken and that people can't get withdraws. However, withdraw are currently painfully slow.

Indeed. There's a post a few up from yours, a current complaint about being unable to withdraw. Regardless - if you read what I posted I spoke about "past problems" with withdrawals, and that that in itself is a red-flag.

Quote from: dyask on September 07, 2015, 12:23:36 PM

Quote

Re: ambiguity. Fair enough. My view is that anyone who doesn't err on the side of caution when it comes to giving any kind of investment advice is irresponsible. But you're right, that's my view.

Quoting or repeating information that isn't current is irresponsible. You clearly aren't using scrypt.cc and you only have second-hand information. Making claims based on second-hand information is irresponsible. It is fine to say there have been reported issues and to urge caution. I think you have stepped over that line. Why even get involved? There are plenty involved with scrypt.cc that are already reporting the problems. The scam cheerleading is just noise that actually confuses the issues. People look at is and say, oh, that is just scum trolling for trouble. Well at least that is what I often think.

I'm fairly certain I don't quote or repeat information (current or otherwise), except where I'm certain. You're quite right that I don't use scrypt.cc - I'm said that before, and I'm happy to acknowledge it. My interest came from being a potential investor (trading GHS looked like commodities trading, and I tend to prefer derivatives and commodities) and being appalled at what I saw - people continuing to invest in a site that raise major red-flags. You could well be right that I've stepped over a line: I've acknowledged before that there are people here with experience of scrypt.cc's problems, who will have a better idea than me whether the problems result from farce or fraud. If those people have concerns about my commenting - I'll stop immediately.

I really don't think "PSAs" urging caution are "scum trolling" - but again, erring on the side of caution is my approach to investments and I'm rapidly learning that not everyone shares that approach (or even regards scrypt.cc as anything other than gambling - in which case, fair enough, to each their own).