Quote from: jonald_fyookball on September 07, 2015, 06:26:14 PM

Quote from: turtlehurricane on September 07, 2015, 06:20:58 PM

Quickseller is now removed from default trust completely

But now a lot of scammers that were negrated by qS wont have red marks.

Could you say who they are? If it's actually clear that they are scammers, surely one of the other default-trusters will be happy to mark them.

If it's not so clear that they are scammers, perhaps they ought to be offered the benefit of the doubt given QS' shoot first, rationalize later modus operandi.

Quote

That's why its important for at least 2-3 DF peeps to do it, because sometimes
people lose the DF.

Not sure why QS wanted to escrow for himself. Bad decision I guess.

Isn't it pretty clear why? He says so himself just upthread:

Quote from: Quickseller on September 07, 2015, 07:38:05 AM

Do you think it is fair that I should have to risk my money on the potential that someone else will run away while acting as escrow, when I have built up my own reputation to a level in which others are willing to risk their money on me, if I want to protect my own identity? This is not unheard of and has happened before. If you think this is fair, then why don't you repay shdvb the $400 that was stolen from him by maidak, the $5,000 that was stolen fromandresmm91, and the $10,000 that he apparently stole from someone on OTC? Maidak was previously one of the most reputable people on the forum until it was revealed that he stole all this money.

There is no reason why I should have to risk my money like that just so I can protect my privacy.

^^^He believes that his "contribution" makes him above the rules that the rest of us mortals are supposed to abide by. If we were all "scambusters" like quickseller, then we'd be free to interpret ethical principals to our own advantage too.