Quote from: Vod on September 08, 2015, 03:46:45 PM

Quote from: Bardman on September 08, 2015, 03:43:43 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 08, 2015, 03:31:24 PM

Quote from: BadBear on September 08, 2015, 06:06:47 AM

I removed Quickseller because he was acting to deceive people, and I can't, and won't, be a part of that (he wasn't banned) if I know about it. I don't think he had bad intentions, or is a bad person, just maybe didn't think it all the way through.

So QS outright lied about being banned (for what reasons I don't know). I don't see how anyone can trust a word of what he types anymore.

Funny enough if a random did what quickseller has done until now he would have gotten hundreds of negative ratings easily, yet quickseller has no negative not even neutral from a dt member.

Quickseller is threatening that anyone who leaves him negative trust will be excluded from DT. Not sure if that is true or not (high level alts?) but I think people are erring on the side caution until all the shit is exposed.

So is it true, there is some kind of high command system in Bitcointalk. Where they decide who will be in default and who will not. Someone from high command can abuse whole system and make Bitcointalk trust system joke.

Since when you are fearing giving negative feedback.