Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 10, 2015, 06:31:13 AM

The JVM doesn't just exist in splendid isolation. Even (falsely) assuming it's secure/stable,

Even falsely assuming any new coin is secure/stable, including Bitcoin which had another bug recently which I saw you were commenting on.

I can assure you the JVM has orders-of-magnitude more eyeballs and test hours logged than Bitcoin and all the shitcoins combined.

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 10, 2015, 06:31:13 AM

the JVM can't (ie shouldn't) do much of anything without its libraries and security models.

Oh really? Then how come I can run my Scala crypto program on JVM without including a ton of Java libraries and no security models.

And hey what does a sandbox security model have to do with crypto code. You are really lost now.

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 10, 2015, 06:31:13 AM

Why does pointing out the obvious advantages of 'closer-to-the-iron' low-level interfaces for security-intensive (fintech, crypto) applications make me a "classic asshole?"

Pointing out illusions in a way that seems impressive to n00bs.

For example, where is the automatic buffer overrun protection in C?

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 10, 2015, 06:31:13 AM

I will accept (slightly) below-market consulting fees

I wouldn't work with you if you paid me to accept your assistance. The Mythical Math Month in spades. You've demonstrated to me on numerous times your inferior skills.

Btw remember you said Armstrong was full of shit. And now October 2015 is finally here and it is all coming down as predicted. Surely you will make some excuses on that this. You've never seen an argument that you can't lie and fake your way through.