The scamming is supposed to be relative to BTC value, as the form asks for the BTC value involved.
His trust rating states 0
BTC, which is accurate. (Unlike, for example, the trust abuse against me by one of the Bytecoin scammers which claims 10
BTC risked or lost, something which is made up out of thin air.)
And he presents no strong evidence to say why I would risk my Hero reputation as Anonymint.
If this devolves to a judgement of personality, then it is a meaningless metric. Surely you are smart enough to see that and I shouldn't have to explain that to you.
The trust system is inherently subjective for better or worse.
I don't "strongly believe" that you are scamming but maybe smoothie does. I'm asking him to reconsider that assessment carefully (especially with emphasis on "strongly").
If there is no basis of preponderance of evidence then the entire Trust system is meaningless.
If you are arguing the system should be meaningless, then go ahead. You seem to love to argue nonsense.
You went against me the other day when you argued that I was hyping and would receive bad outcome for it. Did I receive a bad outcome? Of course not. I will win. Why? Because I have truth, sincerity, and hard work on my side. And those attributes can't be faked.