However, I don't think it is trust abuse, within the context of the cryptocurrency marketplace. Hype of vaporware and conveniently selective disclosure of information is something that has been used by scammers and has a high risk of being employed by someone who is scamming.
Smooth you live in a fantasy world. You know damn well I am not hyping vaporware because you've even seen the Blake2 hash I coded in Scala this past week.
What I've seen is irrelevant as I'm not the one making a scamming allegation, though I have told you a few times now that your hyping without willingness to back it up with evidence will raise that suspicion. Which it does and will.
Again another of your epic logic fails.
My signature line clearly points to a Hero reputation from 2013.
Hero users can and do scam. Often via purchased Hero accounts (or lower Sr, etc. accounts that are mined up to Hero), sometimes not.
Or someone could falsely claim to be a new version of an old Hero account, without proof.
I'm not saying I believe these things, but others might.
And again you argue ad nauseum on a point that doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
He has provided no strong evidence of any of these things. His evidence links to the opening post of this thread, which is a bunch of links to a cat fight.
Smooth when I evaluate people for their efficacy, one thing I look it is how well they reason to the effective point of it. Logic ad nauseum isn't logical.
Correction: When I looked earlier I thought his trust rating linked to a quote of your post but now it does not. I have no idea what he's thinking. Shrug. Time for me to move on from this drama I guess.