Quote from: TPTB_need_war on September 13, 2015, 02:14:07 AM

Quote from: Crestington on September 13, 2015, 02:00:18 AM

It is vapourware until I can use the product and you have produced it.

I realize I only bolded 4 of your words and perhaps your IQ is really challenged by 4 words, but I am not 'promoting'. I asked for a vote on the name and discussion that could help me spur other developers to help me code. This is what open source is all about you fucking idiot.

Open source is not about programming by yourself in a cave as you bullies would force me to do.

Quote from: Crestington on September 13, 2015, 02:00:18 AM

Also your definition of Cyberstalking is also false since I am only replying in this thread, about a particular subject at hand, it's merits and faults.

We'll let a judge decide if your posting of abusive images is stalking or not, especially after I have stated numerous times to stop abusing me.

Quote from: Crestington on September 13, 2015, 02:00:18 AM

I suppose you could be defined as Cyberstalking by replying and harassing people as well since it is a fairly loose definition.

Harrassment is a form of bullying and defamation, especially to the extreme degree you are going with it. And especially coupling it with lies and libel.

Quote from: Crestington on September 13, 2015, 02:00:18 AM

If you are unhappy with the feedback people are posting, there is the ignore button, or you could simply not reply......

Why do you force me to repeat myself by lying about my upthread statements.

I am not unhappy about "feedback" in the normal use of the forums. That is why we are here is to discuss matters.

I have already warned Smoothie that he has abused the trust system out of revenge and libeled me, and unilaterally abused the fact that he appears in the obscure notion of Default Trust which is buried from most readers' awareness, to place an accusation that I am a scammer on my user profile.

He has not provided evidence that I am scammer. This is serious libel and he will pay for it one day.

You said you are going to solve all the problems in Cryptocurrency, then suggested a million dollar IPO with little to no information as to how it would work, this is promotion.

And how are you going to pay these developers to help you with the coding? Please stick to the questions I have asked a couple posts back and lets move away from arguing about legal definitions.

Quote

Ok so a more serious questions now.

Here's a few things I see fault with in your plan of investment and lacktherof discussion of rewards.

1. How do you plan on investors receiving ROI on their investment in Ion?

1-a. There is mention about trying to crowdsource a million dollars in capital for the development of Ion and instanteous, anonymous transactions, however you also mention that the chain is going to be POW but in that model, the price each Coin ultimately falls to the cost of production then then inconceivable for holders to keep their investment with additional Coins continually driving down the price.

1-b. Within the potential crownsourcing there is mention of wanting to use investors funds for a fecal transplant, this is securities fraud.

1-c. The problem that even if you are successful that you may end up being ties up in legal battles over petty squabbles, wasting valuable time and money only to try to prove a point.

2. What is your plan on adoption and use of the system? Instantaneous transactions are largely irrelevant if it cannot be used by the general population and with Bitshares, eMunie, NXT or Ethereum, what makes your Ion concept superior and a better investment to these systems which are already better established? If Bitshares has 1 second transaction times then why should I choose Ion if the cost of POW mining will be continually devaluing the investment, making it somewhat of a trap where in order to get my investment out, there needs to be more investment than the cost of mining and the users leaving the system.

and maybe we can leave this one out for now as Smooth already commented on it.

Quote from: Crestington on September 13, 2015, 02:21:46 AM

Quote from: smooth on September 13, 2015, 02:10:33 AM

Quote from: Crestington on September 13, 2015, 01:58:35 AM

1-b. Within the potential crownsourcing there is mention of wanting to use investors funds for a fecal transplant, this is securities fraud.

How is it fraud of any kind if the investors are told that's what their investment will (or may) be used for?

You are probably right about this but I still see it as a red flag as he suggested using investors funds for personal use rather than on the software itself. I think the best course of action is simply not to handle investors funds directly and avoid that situation altogether, then you never have to worry about cases of securities fraud or the trolling that can come as a result of investors not happy with the use of those funds.