Quote from: LaudaM on September 15, 2015, 08:22:15 AM

Quote from: Peter R on September 15, 2015, 08:11:04 AM

Quote from: LaudaM on September 15, 2015, 08:01:42 AM

...They complained about non existent censorship...

In your opinion, has there been censorship at /r/bitcoin or here?

There might have been censorship at /r/bitcoin. There has not been any censorship here. Threads were getting moved, not deleted, neither did anyone get punished for constructive posts about XT. Let me say this one more time: This is a privately owned forum. If you don't like it then you're free to start your own (as XT supporters did).

Regardless, this is completely off topic. Let's get back to your paper. Peter Todd (source = reddit):

Quote

this paper is fatally flawed and at best rehashes what we already know happens in the "spherical cow" case, without making it clear that it refers to a completely unrealistic setup. It'd be interested to know who actually wrote it - "Peter R" is obviously a pseudonym and the paper goes into sufficient detail that it makes you wonder why the author didn't see the flaws in it.

Quote

You'd be wise to run future work past experts in the field prior to publishing widely if you dislike heated controversy.

Yet with a flawed paper you've managed to gather a group of 'followers' around here. That is interesting.

LaudaM against LaudaM:

"Yet with a flawed paper you've managed to gather a group of 'followers' around here."

"Honestly I do not have time to asses your paper, nor am I that interested in it (in general)."

Makes not much sense to discuss with people like that.