Quote from: enmaku on October 04, 2012, 12:51:50 AM

Quote from: ElectricMucus on October 04, 2012, 12:43:34 AM

Quote from: shad0wbitz on October 04, 2012, 12:32:13 AM

Quote from: ElectricMucus on October 04, 2012, 12:30:46 AM

Quote from: shad0wbitz on October 04, 2012, 12:28:07 AM

More vaporware from the BitInstant boys ... that is clearly a printout of a design, not a real card.

That's a bold claim, do you have any incises to give that credability?

In the mean time I call bullshit. It's real unless you can point out what's wrong with it.

I point gnomes and fairies are real until you can disprove me, you've seen the pictures online right .... flawless logic there

So do you accuse bitinstant of fabricating the photo? Then I suggest you get at it since the burnden of proof lies on you.

Mind you I am not claiming that this picture is absolute proof of the existence of the card but that it suggests it is valid more than your simple claim that it is not. You are engaging in the typical prove me wrong fallacious reasoning. Nobody will take you serious until you back up your accusations with something.

Waitwaitwait...

So when BFL releases some preliminary product renders and folks cry "fraud" you jump on their bandwagon and assert that when the crowd shouts "fraud" the burden of proof is on the manufacturer: "Prove to us you're NOT a fraud!"

Then when BitInstant releases a preliminary product pic and folks cry "fraud" your immediate response is "nono, that's not ok you guys, those making the claims of fraud bear the burden of proof, anything else would be fallacious!"

Inconsistent reasoning is inconsistent.

But seriously...

OMGZ BITINSTANT CARD!

I would imagine the major difference is that bitinstant isn't run by a convicted fraudster and hasn't collected millions of dollars in pre-orders...