Quote from: dyask on September 18, 2015, 10:39:48 PM

Quote from: cryptodevil on September 18, 2015, 07:19:39 PM

Quote from: mitch845 on September 18, 2015, 04:58:47 PM

Quote from: cryptodevil on September 18, 2015, 02:51:04 PM

EVERY SINGLE USER WHO HAS LOST MONEY TO SCRYPT.CC IS ENTITLED TO A FULL REFUND

Really? I don't think so! What about "every single user" who earned money in scrypt.cc?
There are always winners and loosers in ponzis.

And stop call scrypt a "criminal operation". It's just a ponzi site like many thousands others. No one in the world believed this was a real mining company.

You're an idiot.

That some users may have made money does not change the fact that every person who lost is entitled to a full recovery of their funds.

The site promoted itself as a cloud mining operation, it matters not whether you think that people should have known it was a ponzi. It is a criminal operation which took money under false pretences, irrespective of whichever mechanism they ran the financials with in the back office. No jurisdiction permits that.

I find these extremist viewpoints being expressed very troubling. That fact that someone can't express a point of view without being attacked for it is alarming.

Extremist? HAH! Here's the thing, he wasn't expressing a viewpoint, he was claiming something which is utterly incorrect. You are entitled to your own opinion, you are NOT entitled to your own facts.

Correcting someone's false assertions is not 'extremist', although your attempt to again employ 'tone complaint' smacks of more distraction from the fact you can't rebut my assertions because they are true.

Quote from: dyask on September 18, 2015, 10:39:48 PM

None of us knows the true scope of what has happened here and there is room for all of us to be incorrect.

Scrypt.cc sold millions of dollars of mining power they have mathematically been proven not to own, this is criminal fraud. There is no fucking 'room' in that fact for any, "Ah, yes, but . . ." it is a fact supported by evidence.

Quote from: dyask on September 18, 2015, 10:39:48 PM

Let's assume investors are entitled to have their losses returned. While it is probably simple enough to take the sum of deposits minus withdraws to come with how much someone lost or gained, it doesn't mean people will receive back those losses. For a point of reference one can look at the Madoff investment scheme . . . blah blah rambling

*sigh*

Seriously? Are you a child? Are you autistic or are you part of the scam and desperately trying to bail you and your buddy ThorSWO out of the deep shit the perpetrators of this criminal fraud are in?

It matters not whether the funds can be recovered in full, every single fucking investor who made a net loss on an 'investment' which turned out to be fraudulent is legally entitled to a full recovery of their funds. Whether they get it is another matter entirely, but they remain fully entitled to it because they invested into a scheme which promoted itself as something it was not, which is fraud in EVERY financial jurisdiction.