Quote from: Gavin Andresen on October 04, 2012, 07:02:44 PM

If you held a pre-signed transaction that sends the funds back to you with a lockTime of 1 Jan 2013 that would work.

I've been out of the loop for a while.. Does lockTime work correctly nowadays? If not, when is it scheduled to be implemented?

Quote from: Gavin Andresen on October 04, 2012, 07:02:44 PM

I'd have to think a little harder than I want to right now about whether or not signing R knowing only txid==HASH(F) opens up the exchange to attacks. I can't think of any, but the exchange providing a signature when it doesn't know the details of exactly what it is signing makes me nervous.

Well, the worst case scenario (under plausible assumptions) for the exchange signing something arbitrary with some key is to lose control of (or unwittingly commit to) everything associated with that key, so it's important that the key has not been used for anything else.

Now of course if my proposal about transaction id hashes not including signatures were adopted, then the funding transaction could be sent in its unsigned form to the exchange and the exchange could verify that the refund spent the funding transaction because of course the transaction id wouldn't change on signing.

ByteCoin