Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on September 19, 2015, 07:17:35 PM

Quote from: brg444 on September 19, 2015, 07:11:24 PM

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on September 19, 2015, 07:02:22 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 19, 2015, 06:37:50 PM

BIP000 (scale to 1MB now, then reconsider in a couple of years) is winning, and there is literally nothing you can do to change that fact.

LMAO!! Second funniest statement in the whole debate!! You are some clown. Seriously.

70% of last 100 blocks are either 100 or 8mb. Bigger blocks...Mmmmmmmmmmm... Cool

100% of last 100000 blocks are BIP000. Even Jeff Garzik has given up on his broken miners vote proposal.

Try again noob.

Okay, I will spoon feed you. You sound like you need things broken down to simple terms.

The coinbase field being used by miners to indicate their block size preference indicates 70% for 100 or 8mb.

If BIP100 dies ( which I hope it will) then 8mb increase will be the only game in town.

Saying that all the current blocks are current blocks is a bit childish.

Again, you used to at least be funny. Now you're straight up sad. Undecided

BIP100 & BIP101 are the only proposal who bothered with the voting nonsense. Others know better and realize that miners opinion on the matter is worthless as their incentives are not aligned with Bitcoin users.

In short, any form of scaling to be implemented will not resort to pseudo-democracy but consensus.

Therefore, BIP100 dies and so does 8MB. In fact one can argue they are both dead as we speak.

Until then, all current blocks are BIP000 and you shouldn't expect this to change soon Grin