Quote from: brg444 on September 19, 2015, 07:28:28 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 19, 2015, 07:19:03 PM

Quote from: brg444 on September 19, 2015, 07:11:24 PM

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on September 19, 2015, 07:02:22 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 19, 2015, 06:37:50 PM

BIP000 (scale to 1MB now, then reconsider in a couple of years) is winning, and there is literally nothing you can do to change that fact.

LMAO!! Second funniest statement in the whole debate!! You are some clown. Seriously.

70% of last 100 blocks are either 100 or 8mb. Bigger blocks...Mmmmmmmmmmm... Cool

100% of last 100000 blocks are BIP000. Even Jeff Garzik has given up on his broken miners vote proposal.

Try again noob.

the specifics of BIP100 or BIP8MB are irrelevant
point is minners want bigger blocks.
miners have a strong incentive to do what they think is best for bitcoin.
a minority in devs, miners and users feel it's not a good idea to increase block size.

you are very much in the minority.

and <100% of last 100000 blocks are BIP000

Miners incentives are NOT aligned with users and therefore what miners want is irrelevant.

Moreover, it is a majority of devs that are against any significant or irresponsible block size increase and the opinion of users not running a full node is exactly worthless.

Why resort to lies and deception Adam? This is rather sad coming from you Undecided

my arguments can't stand on there own, i need lies and deception to make them appear legit Lips sealed