*more accusations*
There's a full list of users with deposits on page 1 - there are a lot of fairly big users in there.
Can't you just settle for the fact that you were wrong about this one for once?
May I remind you that pirateat40 also had stellar reputation over multiple months before his theft. He also had fairly big depositors. He also had supporters,
people just like you, ardently arguing that pirateat40 always paid, and that, therefore, there is no way he was going to turn out to be a fraudster.
If I recall correctly, Shadow383 was one of the most vocal people against pirate.
Since there are so many people that are certain of vescudero's nefarious intentions, I think we need a new bet. How should the wording be to make sure you don't skip because of technicalities? Scammer label till mid 2013? A new scheme and then default till mid 2013? Longer?