Quote from: BitNow on September 21, 2015, 02:07:51 PM

Quote from: MakingMoneyHoney on September 21, 2015, 02:03:30 PM

If you think "The Queen of England is a God" and they are born of "gods" then it is not scriptural and you are only proving to me that it is more and more like a pagan religion than I ever thought it was.

Jesus Christ claimed he was the son of God.

How does this make any difference from the Supreme Governor of the Anglican Church or the Bishop of Rome?

The only difference is that they are living during our times.

Hence the question: would we have believed in Jesus Christ if we were living during his times?

I the answer is yes we should believe in the Supreme Governor of the Anglican Church or the Bishop of Rome now, if the answer is no then we are not Christians.

Hope this is understandable English enough.

Thank You.

The bible clearly predicted Jesus coming and Jesus returning. There is no mention of a Pope or Queen being born to the Lord who created us to do anything. Although, it does talk about a beast coming up.... If the woman represents a church, it can easily describe the papacy. Purple and scarlet, the robes of the clergy?

Revelation 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 5 And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth.

6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration. 7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns. 8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. 10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. 11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. 12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. 13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. 14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful. 15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues. 16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire. 17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled. 18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.

Quote from: BitNow on September 21, 2015, 02:12:12 PM

Quote from: BitNow on September 21, 2015, 02:07:51 PM

Quote from: MakingMoneyHoney on September 21, 2015, 02:03:30 PM

If you think "The Queen of England is a God" and they are born of "gods" then it is not scriptural and you are only proving to me that it is more and more like a pagan religion than I ever thought it was.

Jesus Christ claimed he was the son of God.

How does this make any difference from the Supreme Governor of the Anglican Church or the Bishop of Rome?

The only difference is that they are living during our times.

Hence the question: would we have believed in Jesus Christ if we were living during his times?

I the answer is yes we should believe in the Supreme Governor of the Anglican Church or the Bishop of Rome now, if the answer is no then we are not Christians.

Hope this is understandable English enough.

Thank You.

Saying that in another way: our Faith is not strong enough for being called Christians as we are not believing the Vicars of Christ on Earth.

That means that, if we have lived during Jesus Christ time (2000 years ago), we won't have believed Jesus Christ.

We would had be the people calling "Barabba, Barabba" when Pilate were making us choose between Jesus Christ and Barabba in the Pilat judgment of Jesus Christ.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilate%27s_court

Hope this is understandable English enough.

Thank You.

No, I am quite filled with the Holy Spirit to lead me towards the one true Lord. Following His commandments and confessing to the Lord (not a priest) as Jesus told us to do. The bible clearly says Jesus is coming on the clouds and all eyes will see.