Quote from: traumschiff on September 21, 2015, 08:40:06 PM

Quote from: smooth on September 21, 2015, 08:08:23 PM

Quote from: jimlite on September 21, 2015, 04:58:54 PM

Where was it stated in stone that John Connor said Vanilla coin was 100% coded without a single byte or line of code ever used in the history of crypto?

Right here (emphasis added)

Quote from: john-connor on August 12, 2015, 09:36:20 PM

No, this is not a fork. It was built from scratch in it's entirety.

Note: quoted date is incorrect; correct date is 2014-12-15, 00:19:37

Are you going to keep asking stupid questions to try to obscure reality with a bunch of confusion and doubt over the (well documented) accusations against him, or are you going to quit digging a deeper hole?

Let's be honest here, he put a lot more effort, work, code and innovation in Vanillacoin than you put into XMR and Aeon together.

That's not relevant in the slightest to whether Bitcoin code has been misappropriated without attribution, and misrepresented as "from scratch in it's entirety", which it has.

You're basically conceding the question when you can only respond to it by changing the subject, spamming, thread bombing, etc.

If your argument is, "Yes, we're lying thieving scumbags. Too bad, our coin is so damn good it's going to take over the world anyway" then I guess you're entitled to take that approach. 100% for sure there are people who will buy in on such a coin.

Quote

Sit down for a minute and give this a thought. Starting to agree with some people that bitcointalk is pure cancer for the alt community, read back on the OPs posting history and you actually jumped on his thread, the 33rd thread to explain the very same thing you already did in the past ones.

Oh I agree with you there. Free speech really is an ugly vile thing in a lot of ways (though I still support it)

IMO the usefulness of this thread ended with post #2.