Quote from: runpaint on September 21, 2015, 10:45:48 PM

Do you remember in this topic, when some guy showed up and had a whole story about the 2 PoW mining phases of Banx, and how miners got a lot of BanxShares, and how the coins at C-Cex only got forked because miners were exploiting the network? Just a bunch of imaginary lies, but he was pretending it was a real series of events?

Hold on, I was fine with you questioning BANX and M. Lyford, he's a big boy and can defend himself. But now you're calling ME a liar and a sockpuppet, just because you seem unable to order events in their proper time frame. So here's a simple, incontrovertible fact you can't argue with, the code for the original BANX wallet I got from the github:

Code:

int64 static GetBlockValue(int nHeight, int64 nFees)
{
int64 nSubsidy = 2 * COIN;

if(nHeight==5) return 5400000 * COIN;

if(nHeight==43002) return 551184 * COIN;

if(nHeight>7000) nSubsidy = 1 * COIN;

if(nHeight>42700) return nFees;

return nSubsidy + nFees;
}

You can see exactly how the mining happened, and why it was easy for miners to 51% the small network subtly and keep creating new shares for a while. You can compare that with the code for the new PoS wallet if you want, but since you haven't bothered to investigate and just called me a liar, I don't expect you to bother trying to fit these facts in your version of reality.

According to you, I'd be a victim of a huge scam with BANX. Makes me wonder why you'd attack me without checking any of the things I tried to help you with and lose some of your credibility in the process.