Quote from: jasinlee on October 07, 2012, 02:08:40 PM

Quote from: oldschool on October 07, 2012, 02:04:09 PM

Quote from: k3t3r on October 07, 2012, 01:48:40 PM

Quote from: oldschool on October 07, 2012, 01:47:17 PM

Quote from: theymos on October 07, 2012, 02:41:13 AM

Quote from: Bogart on October 06, 2012, 11:41:02 PM

Theymos, can you tell us whether you control the ~675 BTC currently in GBLSE address 1FX22c76vybHJSJdCCjKHDHhcMDhDX87nw, or if Nefario does (or none of the above)?

I am seeing conflicting information.

I hold ~800 BTC in "anonymous" user funds. It doesn't belong to anyone in particular. If I had the GLBSE user database, I would send this BTC proportionally to all GLBSE users.

Nefario has, I would guess, 4000-8000 user BTC in total.

MtGox had a ~9000btc volume spike in one hour yesterday, I'd say Nefario has 90k USD not 8000BTC

based on what evidence?

What evidence for the phrase "I'd say"? My thoughts and opinions. I don't need "evidence" to say my opinion and speculation.

My evidence that he is scamming everyone? A friend tried to "invest" ~150BTC and wasn't able to because of an error with the website, emailed Nefario who responded that he "fixed" the problem and try and send again.... 5 minutes later the website was shutdown with the index page replaced. Looks like my friend had the unfortunate experience of sending money during the time he was shutting everything down, he actually re-enabled the site just to get that extra BTC and then shut it down immediately after.

If he was shutting it down due to legal issues, why would he accept ~150BTC 5 minutes before turning out the lights?

The writing is on the wall folks, this is just the latest scam in bitcoin history.

That alone should get that scammer tag assigned and be enough to stop him from getting the btc from theymos. Do you have the tx?

I've suggested that this friend get involved, however they wish to remain anonymous and silent on the issue... I told them the emails, email headers, and tx history would be proof positive but I guess they'd prefer to keep their privacy and anonymity on the issue. Things like this I've never understood, but to each their own.