Quote from: poeEDgar on October 02, 2015, 08:21:55 PM

Quote from: knight22 on October 02, 2015, 08:13:44 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on October 02, 2015, 08:10:45 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on October 02, 2015, 08:08:38 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on October 02, 2015, 07:59:31 PM

or Blockstream Wink

no-one's forcing you to use that either, are they jonald?

Correct.

The difference is that there is a certain entrenchment of the existing consensus rules based on the history and usage of the core repository.
As is evidenced by miners voting on scalability with their block signatures, the core consensus rules are no longer satisfactory for everyone.

what?

In other word, no one is satisfied that the consensus rules among Core devs only leads to no decision making.

I don't think that's an accurate representation. If the decision-making rules are insufficient, what do you propose -- exactly? Has anyone actually attempted to amend the BIP process and bring the question to the Core devs?

I think the market should ultimately choose. Other implementations should be launched in the wild like XT did until one finally reaches consensus. In that sense the consensus rules among Core devs become irrelevant and Wladimir should just do its job and take decisions for what happens with Core.