Quote from: traumschiff on October 08, 2015, 10:53:21 AM

Quote from: patmast3r on October 08, 2015, 10:45:08 AM

Quote from: traumschiff on October 08, 2015, 10:39:51 AM

Quote from: patmast3r on October 08, 2015, 10:24:51 AM

Quote from: binarygangster on October 08, 2015, 10:03:45 AM

who needs research when we can just assume willy nilly...

You mean like all the VNL shills assume that zerotime is actually safe ?
It very well may be, I'm not saying it's not. It's just it seems to me that most people who follow VNL aren't all that well versed and just believe whatever john-connor throws at them.

That's generally true for most bitcointalk members, not only for the followers of XY project and it also has nothing to do with the current topic. The starting point here was r0ach and his statement which he started with him admitting that he didn't even research it thus your argument is just as invalid as in a past thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1170906.msg12358760#msg12358760) where you stated Poloniex doesn't do code audits just because your coin was never audited.

I have no coin. If you are refering to the only project I was ever involved in then you're wrong because that was audited by poloniex which is where i had the information from (as I told you in the other thread).

You told me what I'm saying is not accurate because your project/code was only scanned for malware, read back the thread mate

All I said was, that I'm assuming that they're only scanning for malware because that's what someone from poloniex told me. They also told me that because they sometimes can't scan for maleware they run those in VMs (which wouldn't protect against faulty algo now would it ?). I didn't state it as fact.
I'm still of that opinion btw. Let's just agree to disagree and move on. K mate ?