Quote from: JoelKatz on October 12, 2012, 01:52:45 PM

Quote from: EhVedadoOAnonimato on October 12, 2012, 01:47:54 PM

If, as I understood, Nefario disrespected the company rules, and therefore its owners, when he closed down GLBSE, it doesn't make sense to attribute such closure to GLBSE (= its owners), since, for all the matters, Nefario was no longer acting within his role of CEO. He was "attacking" GLBSE.

Until and unless someone authorize to represent GLBSE actually makes this argument on behalf of GLBSE, I wouldn't credit it.

Didn't theymos made this argument in the OP of his topic asking for the tag to be applied to Nefario? Wasn't such disrespect of GLBSE rules the reason for BadBear to tag him?
IIRC that's what happened.
EDIT, here it is:

Quote from: theymos on October 06, 2012, 12:00:57 AM

Nefario has defrauded me and others in several different ways and deserves a scammer tag.
- The BitcoinGlobal bylaws state that BitcoinGlobal's purpose is to operate GLBSE. By shutting down GLBSE without amending the bylaws, Nefario has violated the bylaws.
- He has stated that he would ignore any motion to remove him as CEO.

Quote from: JoelKatz on October 12, 2012, 01:52:45 PM

Scammer tags are more like warnings than findings of guilt.

Okay, whatever. I'd just give the guy a little more time.