Quote from: 1aguar on October 14, 2015, 06:53:19 AM

Quote from: vero on October 14, 2015, 06:27:26 AM

By now, I think it's pretty obvious that the Russian backed rebel were the shooters. My question is, why was a civilian airliner flying over an active warzone

It is far from obvious.
What you posted is 100% presumption.

On 9/11, there were many presumptions, and then one narrative became the "official story". That story was false.

So, please bring forward the research to back up your claim because it is far from "obvious".

Quote from: XEPBAM on October 13, 2015, 02:11:41 PM

The conclusions didn't set out to lay blame on any particular group that is out of the investigators remit and will be dealt with in a separate case.

Can be .. but ... Ukrainian never shot any missile ... because rebelle in east had no planes / helicopter and never used anyone... so why using them ? And civil plane was flying at 10.000 meters ... and none of usual weapons was able to hit it ... beside the use of Buk missile ...

And why DNR deleted so many tweet about buk just after the crash of MH17 .. either the video ... why they are so ... amazed to see a civil plane ...

First Russian claim ? -> Plane has been shut down by Ukrainian war plane ... RT video available ...
Second Russia claim ? -> plane has been shit down by ... haa yes ... Israelian missile ... RT video available ...

So wich one now russian will show us ? Hoo perhaps little green men , yes ... because i doubt any simple citizen can use an mobile missile launcher ... with just a 10 pages paper manual ... Buk is multi target missile launcher ...

They showed us proof of satelitte ... picture ... and full load of shit about ... so why ... really why posting such shit if you know the truth ?

If russian was aware really , Ukrainian was behind with the use of the Buk ... why creating such fake proof Huh

That's the question ...

Because no one can deny that Buk was and has been used by rebelle ... how they shut down 2 war plane 1 week before ?