Quote from: TPTB_need_war on October 19, 2015, 11:39:37 AM

Quote from: rpietila on October 19, 2015, 10:39:58 AM

3) I never said the banksters will surrender without a fight, but they will have a hard time finding people to fight against others' imagination soon.

The decentralized systems with no "controlling entity" will have this quality. But a regulated/unregistered company running a coin doesn't have this quality and thus is culpable under man's law serfdom. Daniel 2:44 say the righteous unassailable kingdom will "break apart" meaning it will be decentralized.

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on October 18, 2015, 08:21:42 PM

Quote from: rpietila on October 18, 2015, 07:51:55 PM

So you are making a lethal weapon of financial self-defence, which the system cannot destroy, and therefore you (the system and the people) will learn to respect the mutual differences?

Well I just proposed the exact same!

Isn't it so elegant to discover that the best arrangement for the free market (i.e. no futures contracts which is the Proverb I learned from Hommel, "Do not be surety for another person" and I refined more as per below) in making each development autonomous from the succeeding ones (and let the market decide to burn their coins to the next improved fork) is also the one that is legal.

The point is do not promise the future, because the further away the future, the less control one truly has. Better to sell what you have now, then in the future sell what you have then. Gives the markets more degrees-of-freedom. This is why Ethereum's lockup of shares for so long was so evil...

Jason Hommel's theological research should be linked to in the above context.