Quote from: dooglus on October 18, 2015, 11:16:52 PM

Exactly! And neither is hers.

You seem to be confusing the bitcointalk account with the CLAM project.

I was under the impression that the SuperClam account was under the control of Xploited and Creative because it was considered the community account. Xploited delegated the forum task to Creative and he rarely signs into the SUPERclam account. (I'm not trying to put words in anyone's mouth here of course... I'm just saying if the community truly makes a shit then they should be allowed to hold elections)

Quote from: dooglus on October 18, 2015, 11:16:52 PM

We don't get to vote who controls bitcoin.org if we don't like the current owner. We make a new site and if it's more popular it will become the default place that people go.

https://bitcoin.org/en/about-us

Bitcoin.org was originally registered and owned by Bitcoin's first two developers, Satoshi Nakamoto and Martti Malmi. When Nakamoto left the project, he gave ownership of the domain to additional people, separate from the Bitcoin developers, to spread responsibility and prevent any one person or group from easily gaining control over the Bitcoin project.

I'd say the control over the project is insane atm. The amount of brown nosing that has to be done to get a link on the OP is truly stupid.

What if tomorrow someone opens a 0% edge and 0% invest dice site and the JD link is removed from the OP because why would any noob play at 1% or invest at 10%?

I think if a site is "legit" and performs the CLAM task they say the will, then it should be listed on the CLAM OP.