Quote from: sp_ on October 23, 2015, 09:28:26 AM

Quote from: pallas on October 23, 2015, 09:25:18 AM

Quote from: sp_ on October 23, 2015, 09:12:30 AM

Quote from: pallas on October 23, 2015, 08:28:21 AM

Quote from: NiceHashSupport on October 23, 2015, 08:14:43 AM

Quote from: sp_ on October 23, 2015, 08:08:10 AM

nobody will use it

If we believe that nobody would use the improved kernel (just like you suspect), then of course, we are not interested to buy it.
We are only interested in improvements, that would be actually useful for large amount of miners. That is why it is important for which algorithm the improvement is.

I will provide info on my mining works by mail later.
BTW, I think you should create a new thread about this discussion.

Let's say I get a bounty of 6BTC from doing a quark kernal that does 10MHASH.
Would you be angry if I modify and use your groestl opensource and give you 0 BTC?

It happened already. It happens always with opensource. It's up to you if you wonna donate. If I didn't want people to use it, I wouldn't have opensourced it.
If by doing that you break the licensing, that's a completely different matter.
If you sleep well after doing that, that depends on your moral.

The private farms sleep well.
They earn millions and use your work without paying a dime.

I know that. I have other opensource works (crypto unrelated) in the same situation. Still I continue to write opensource programs. I just see past the direct and sudden profit.
BTW, I don't understand where you are going: you did release opensource code, didn't you?