Quote from: BitcoinSanDiego on October 24, 2015, 03:01:43 PM

Quote from: pdogg147 on October 24, 2015, 02:31:26 PM

Quote from: BitcoinSanDiego on October 24, 2015, 02:18:06 PM

Quote from: merc84 on October 24, 2015, 02:05:39 PM

Quote from: BitcoinSanDiego on October 24, 2015, 01:25:31 PM

Quote from: pdogg147 on October 23, 2015, 10:36:27 PM

Well nothing in crypto is a sure thing. I agree that we eventually want to be on Poloniex and maybe Cryptsy but it needs to be at the right time.

Everything in crypto is a sure thing if the code is open-source. Bitcoin is a transparent protocol --- nobody would use Bitcoin if they weren't sure that the next block would exist.

As for the "right time" to get onto more exchanges or open-source? With this one-man "development team" that appears to be never. Which is the point of open-source. As long as this protocol is not transparent there is very little this community can do to assist in development or marketing.

Can't help but feel you're more interested in something to stimulate price so you can dump coins for profit. Viz has engaged respectfully with you in discussions about your concerns yet you continue to make negative remarks towards him. From my point of view distribution is a more pressing concern than additional exchanges, what is really needed and has been talked about much previously is a gpu pool. The source code has been made available privately for bittrex to review I see no reason why this would not also be the case for cryptsy and polo if they were interested. If Viz wants some time to patent the LLL which he has spent much time developing then I have no issue waiting for that, I would prefer however to see some development on software front for example, there are a few small bugs in the latest release of the miners, there is no staking android wallet and a gpu pool would help with distribution.

Dumping coins is not in my interest. Market-making, yes. That is the only meaningful contribution a community can make to a cryptocurrency that is closed-source and centrally controlled by one individual.

It is not negative to repeat the very clear facts that Videlicet already verified are true.

So then let me ask you then, what would you personally be able to contribute to this Project IF it were open-sourced? You continually imply that this is all we need, so instead of continual criticism (lately) tell us how and why. And please don't say we will get more investors because we are on Poloniex. Ethereum and Bitshares were the top coins over there and now look at where the price went. Also, I acknowledge that you have held this position for quite some time.

Thank you for asking.

1) I would contribute code review. I would analyze protocol line-by-line and help to raise concerns about vulnerabilities in code. Currently, the code could be completely vulnerable and insecure due to closed-source nature

2) I would share repository with others to bring about further developer interest in blockchain technology

3) I would start a blog/web page to help others understand the underlying code of Nexus with explanations and links to repository

4) I would leverage connections with many professionals in Bitcoin trading arena to expand market adoption, such as exchanges and wallet services

Thank you for answering. Those would definitely be beneficial to this Community if they were used to help Nexus.

1) Agreed. I think Viz has been very thorough, but others viewing the code for vulnerabilities will benefit the Project as a whole. Obviously for widespread use this is necessary. We all understand that. Viz is working on a solution to prevent easy cloning of the platform. We take this idea seriously, but none of us want this Work exploited.

2) We all want to see this.

3) This would certainly be inline with the Mission of Nexus and would be a welcome service.

4) That would certainly be beneficial. I think with a collective effort from all of us, Nexus most certainly will end up on other exchanges. Can you expand on what you mean by wallet services?