Quote from: stan.distortion on October 25, 2015, 02:09:33 PM

Quote from: smoothie on October 25, 2015, 02:01:09 PM

Quote from: stan.distortion on October 25, 2015, 01:57:40 PM

Quote from: smoothie on October 25, 2015, 01:54:03 PM

...
How many people claimed this that you can quote?

100? 200? 300?

Please enlighten us all on how many you have actually heard from claiming this.

Again, read through the start of the thread instead of taking the word of random fudders as gospel, there's about a dozen posts from established miners offering 10k and 20k batches for sale. Do your own research ffs.

No.

You made the claim, now back it up.

You pointed to the IP list claiming that many miners were there at the start, that claim gets refuted by ip address association. Now you responded making claims contrary to what some of us see.

No, you made all kinds of false claims and I'm refuting them. Here's someone who was there:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg12691335#msg12691335

EDIT: Quoting in case clicking a link's too much trouble for you:

Quote from: kaene on October 15, 2015, 08:53:36 AM

Quote from: AdamWhite on October 14, 2015, 12:19:00 PM

Quote

clearly a mistake...

With all the damning evidence released clearly showing the instamine was obviously intentional........

"evidence"? I'll try to reply to a troll Grin

I was there during the "instamine", go check the first pages of this thread and you will see me complaining and discussing.

Evan updated the code many times during the first hours/days because various mistakes. I had some talks in IRC with him during the first days/weeks, and my conclusion was that the instamine happened because he just wasn't very familiarized with Bitcoin codebase and he didn't test his coin properly before launch, plus, at that time most coins were launched without a proper difficulty adjustment algorithm (Kimoto's Gravity Well was fresh new at that time and most coins didn't include it at launch).

I also saw his nickname mining in pools, he didn't even ranking top 10 of the miners (and pools had most of network's hashrate), at that time people didn't hide their nicknames in pools and you were used to see always the same names.

Moreover, if you spend some minutes analyzing the blockchain and you follow the first 1-10 mined blocks (those that are clearly mined by the dev) you will see that eventually they all go to the same addresses, with many other blocks and coins coming from pool-mining, and finally these after weeks don't account for more than 80k XCoins (about 2BTC at the time). I guess that's why he tried to buy some more, and he made it publicly (of course people like you would had thought he was hyping it to then dump his coins at higher price). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg4961359#msg4961359

But the most important, the instamine didn't matter, if anything, it helped with the distribution, and the reason is because during the first weeks of life of XCoin you could buy 100k XCoin for just 2.5BTC - 5BTC, so everyone had his chance for weeks to decide to risk and buy or just sell (I myself sold more than 50k XCoin for less than 2BTC, and decided to buy some back later more expensive):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg4889177#msg4889177
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg4872871#msg4872871
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg4867363#msg4867363

Next time you talk about the instamine, understand that those of us who don't care about it is because we understand what happened (can't say the same about you or others just repeating the same over and over without proper knowledge or analysis). We judge XCoin-Darkcoin-DASH (and Evan) for 20 months of upgrades, delivering promises and innovation, and we invest in it because we know it will continue delivering.

Is that it?

Oh and by the way it wasn't me who made the claim that "there was hundreds of miners"....it was your fearful leader Evan.

So who needs to provide proof? I think Evan does, not me.