Quote from: iCEBREAKER on October 26, 2015, 08:30:25 AM

Hi Gliss,

Please stop ignoring the fact that Dash no longer claims there was "No Premine" in their OP.

They took it out because they have conceded their "instamine" was essentially a premine.

That leaves CoinMarketCap as the only official entity claiming Dash's unannounced launch+massive instamine is (in any substantial way) different from an instamine.

Is it your intention to (by listing it among the "Non-Premined" coins) confer upon Dash the legitimacy of non-premined coins that gave the public forewarning of their launch, and whose actual emission does not (to the benefit of the dev and his forewarned insider associates) vary wildly from the theoretical?

If Dash is no longer excusing or defending its former "No Premine" claim with technicalities, why is CoinMarketCap?

You can easily click on the Dash [ANN] thread to verify it no longer claims the coin had "No Premine."

Evan Duffield, the OP, no longer lists "No Premine" among Dash's attributes, and neither should CMC.

You added the **premined warning to Dash before, but then took it off.

Why was that? Did someone threaten or bribe you?

Please explain why CMC still lists Dash among non-premined coins, and consider changing that to reflect the current claims of their own [ANN].

I have that list linked from my profile on this forum, as a "Shitcoin Auto-filter" and I'd really appreciate it if you would make that claim more completely accurate.

Thanks!

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on October 18, 2015, 01:38:40 AM

Dash has removed the "No Premine" claim from their [ANN] thread.

It's funny because now CoinMarketCap claims Dash isn't premined, although the OP no longer makes such an assertion.

I addressed it 6 months ago, what exactly has changed since then?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199685.msg11221343#msg11221343