Quote from: goodCopbadCop on October 27, 2015, 09:24:00 PM

Quote from: dEBRUYNE on October 27, 2015, 09:10:01 PM

Quote from: BiteMyShinyMetalAss on October 27, 2015, 08:41:04 PM

Quote from: TheDasher on October 27, 2015, 08:40:00 PM

Quote from: BiteMyShinyMetalAss on October 27, 2015, 08:34:35 PM

Quote from: TheDasher on October 27, 2015, 08:31:13 PM

Quote from: BiteMyShinyMetalAss on October 27, 2015, 08:19:58 PM

Quote from: TheDasher on October 27, 2015, 07:59:26 PM

Quote from: BiteMyShinyMetalAss on October 27, 2015, 07:54:43 PM

As much as you want, you cant deny benefits of DASH over bitcoin.
The argument that it was instant mine is stupid. So what? Why should I even care?
All I care is the development and progress which is lighting fast!
Bitcoin was solo mined for how long? How many coins does Satoshi has?

You are not answering the question! What is the difference from Bitcoin being solomined and DASH instamined?
How many coins does Satoshi has?
Does bitcoin price not fluctuate?
Is there no developement? Is it all fake? Is DASH not inovative coin?
The only argument you say is INSTAMINE so what?
Again. Whats the difference from bitcoin being solomined and DASH instamined?

What is the difference from Bitcoin being solo mined and dash instamined? You dont even know who is Satoshi!
Here is the birth of DASH https://dashtalk.org/threads/the-birth-of-darkcoin.162/ nothing hidden, all transparent.

What is the difference from Bitcoin being solo mined and dash instamined? You dont even know who is Satoshi!
Here is the birth of DASH https://dashtalk.org/threads/the-birth-of-darkcoin.162/ nothing hidden, all transparent.

Your kind of wrong with your first sentence, because Satoshi wasn't the only miner on the network. See the following post of smooth:

Quote from: smooth on October 26, 2015, 05:58:42 AM

Quote from: AlexGR on October 26, 2015, 05:33:12 AM

BTC was solomined

BTC was never solomined. There are well known people who mined at or near the very beginning who showed up later with a large amount of coins, plus a number of well known people whose coin holdings are less well known but clearly were also mining. Since there were no exchanges and little to no trading, mining would have been the only way to get them. Those are only the well-known ones, too. There were certainly other unkown people mining who were just more private about it ever since. As you said, satoshi is reported to have mined a million coins, but 2.5 million were mined in the first year, so clearly other people were mining too.

LTC was instamined, but as I said only about 1% of the current supply. If you are trying to argue that is in any way similar to a 33% instamine you are either being dishonest or are just very confused. I'm not sure which.

yes. mr good cop. evan was not solo mining as well. but the tiny group initially mining btc is to be respected (remenber no one in the world knew what the heck is a cryptocurrency at that whole period), while the proportionally bigger group mining dash is not to be taken into consideration (remember, dash was previoulsly announced here... a place full of miners)

so, distribution is unfair because of instamine? is btc distribution any better, with huge miners domiating the network, and the huge price?

the distribution and the instamine talk is pure false moralistic pseudo communist bullshit. and if you defend this shit YOU are a troll, good cop, bad cop, it makes no difference.

bye

Kind of ironic you took the time to make a new account and post this. Anyway, did I say anything about the instamine? Reread my post please and tell me if I did. I was simply refuting AlexGR statement that Satoshi was solomining. Nothing more, nothing less.