Quote from: mark coins on October 28, 2015, 03:27:35 PM

Quote from: snipie on October 28, 2015, 03:16:52 PM

Quote from: hilariousandco on October 28, 2015, 09:50:54 AM

Quote from: uwichii on October 28, 2015, 09:40:45 AM

Ok if this a shit posting i will correct it,, more words to approved like a long story

Adding more shit to a shit sandwich doesn't make it any more meaty. It's not just the length of your posts but the content. Many users on this campaign just string their replies out to a half assed sentence but it doesn't make it any less spam and they'll still be banned for it. You need to concentrate on putting some actual thought and meat into your posts rather than just churning out rubbish as fast as you can.

Why don't btctalk implement a warning system for those spammers? (whether they are in signature compaign or not)
I know you mods/admins are banning those who spam alot. But the other remains safe so what I mean is if someone report a guy with silly-spammy post he need to receive a first warning, if he continue posting low quality posts he will receive a second warning or a tempban, if he still making shitposts a definitive ban should be applied..

If someone gets banned for the first time by 7 or 14 days that means its the first warning and 60days for the 2nd warning and permanent banned for the 3rd time so i guess its not neccesarily needed to add what you like

In that case I mean before getting banned for 7-14 days, like the guy above and many users reported in meta or via the report button and they didn't get banned because of low post quality - simply a warning message could correct their behaviour