Quote from: Jumbley on October 31, 2015, 11:39:56 AM

My understanding is that Myriad coin was improved from DigiBytes involvement, it was mutually beneficial for both coins but we have progressed so much further. As this person has openly admitted, they are not a Myriad developer and I'm sure 8bitcoder could have achieved an acknowledgement on the first page in this thread simply by asking for it directly. That is not what this is about. This is simply about getting some attention from people looking at our thread. Well, they are getting that but I doubt it is really the attention they are seeking because they certainly don't look ready for it and any further cooperation between our developers is looking less and less likely to happen now because of him. What's more this individual is well on the way to proving one of these coins is a scam coin and it isn't DigiByte!

Myriad hasn't taken anything from DigiByte. Citation needed. DigiByte copied Myriad's multi-algo design, and Myriad released a fix for the timewarp, as well as a fix for the work computing function, before DigiByte did. The fact is, Myriad keeps its security more up to date than DigiByte. The only way DigiByte has progressed further, is through its marketing. And its market cap, which is partly due to the fact that it is premined and instamined.

How can Myriad possibly be a scam? It is a community-run coin, it is not spearheaded by any company. There is no premine, and no instamine. It is impossible for Myriad to be a scam. DigiByte, however, is potentially a scam, and it's looking ever more likely... STILL I am being ignored. How will DigiSpeed solve the scalability issue in Bitcoin? How will you encourage enough people to run full nodes when your blockchain becomes incredibly bloated?