Quote from: bigrcanada on October 31, 2015, 06:58:12 PM

Quote from: AdamWhite on October 31, 2015, 06:52:53 PM

Quote from: bigrcanada on October 31, 2015, 04:57:42 PM

Quote from: AdamWhite on October 31, 2015, 04:31:58 PM

Good morning Mr. White. I certainly don't need to justify anything....though I'm interested in what your investing/holding or using to do commerce with. Using your sense of morality as you claim, what passes as meeting this most high bar of excellence?

Good morning

Is a little honesty about the instamine too much to ask?

Look on the right - "0.00000000% pre-mined". That's an unbelievably brazen and deceptive statement considering the 500,000 coins that were mined in the first hour and 1.5 million in the first 8 hours Roll Eyes

So now that the DASH team have removed "No premine" from their Bitcointalk Announcement thread, when can we expect a clarification on this point on the Bitcointalk thread, not to mention the Media stories and Press Releases about DASH which still aren't disclosing anything about the instamine.

The instamine happened. Period.

Now...my question: I'm interested in what your investing/holding or using to do commerce with. Using your sense of morality as you claim, what passes as meeting this most high bar of excellence?

"The instamine happened" - this is your response? Roll Eyes

Yeah it did, and meanwhile eduffield is advertising "0.000000000% premine"

From reddit:

Quote

"Evan has said that it was accidental, but the fishy thing about that is that the coin had already been rebooted once on that day. An accident of 1.8 million coins (1.5 million in the first 8 hours) seems like a really good reason to reboot"

Not to eduffield! The instamine later allowed him to hire himself as full-time lead developer. What a fortunate "accident"!

What's most shocking is how eduffield continues to claim the instamine wasn't intentional despite the mountain of damning evidence to the contrary. He actually thinks he will get away with this?