Quote from: mexxer-2 on November 06, 2015, 09:03:28 AM

Quote from: subSTRATA on November 06, 2015, 08:56:52 AM

this campaign thing came up in the services section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1238316.0
aside from the fact that this is really sketchy (anonymous "investment" accounts), this looks more or less to be an ad for a marketing campaign in the sense that op seems to be looking for active advertisers, rather than a traditional sig ad campaign (pay for posting).

Quote from: anonymousinvest on November 06, 2015, 01:49:39 AM

build a team of graphic designers ,copywriters and internet marketers tell the world about

figured it would come up here eventually, thoughts on this? i personally think it shouldnt be included in the op.

Thats is not a signature campaign AFAIK, although it resembles one. I would say something like NitrogenSport's signature campaign on Games and rounds board. You can keep posting without a pay, as in NitrogenSport's campaign, in the end, even though the funds are escrowed. Would say this is some kind of ref competition, where the participants who have the highest number of reffered members(min ref investment on Anoninvest campaign is 10btc ). So all in all it shouldn't even be on Service board, but in Games and rounds

I would not add them either, not because they look sketchy, but because its a competition. They can call it campaign all they want, but its not one. You (or your team) has to compete with others to win a price.

Of course the final decision is still with Mitchell and I can quickly fill a line with ** as there is nothing to report for that "campaign" anyway. All we could do is summarize it in one or two sentences and put up a link.