Quote from: criptix on November 08, 2015, 03:53:59 PM

Quote from: MakingMoneyHoney on November 08, 2015, 03:44:43 PM

Quote from: criptix on November 08, 2015, 03:42:41 PM

Quote from: MakingMoneyHoney on November 08, 2015, 03:29:52 PM

Quote from: criptix on November 08, 2015, 02:45:31 PM

Quote from: MakingMoneyHoney on November 08, 2015, 01:48:38 PM

Quote from: blablahblah on November 08, 2015, 10:58:02 AM

It shows how women are professional liars and social chameleons. Special probes inside the crotch that measure sexual arousal DO NOT LIE.
A woman "identifying" as straight is about as truthful as the "I have a boyfriend" excuse that they all parrot. They only say it to avoid a tiny bit of awkwardness. It's actually quite enlightening for me. As, I guess an 'ally' of the LGBT community, I've often wondered what is it about lesbians and bisexuals that makes them so different and interesting? It turns out that it's not just their unavailability, or me sabotaging myself by wanting what I can't have, my intuition was right all along in that they're simply more HONEST human beings.

The women who say they are straight, are straight. There has been so much subliminal, implantation of sexualization of women, for all men and women in everything they watch, the beauty magazines they read, the sexualization of "things" over people, like the picture of breasts is usually combined with sex on tv, movies, etc. These things will create physical reactions in the body when they see these images. It's basic psychology, like Pavlov's dogs.

So what you basicially saying is that homosexuality is a thing of the modern time and only related to human social media?

You need better comprehension skills. I said nothing of the sort. Certainly people were homosexual before social media. The OP claimed no women were straight, which is utterly ridiculous.

I tried to read your post again.
Still coming to the same conclusion.

Sorry you feel that way. But I don't agree that homosexuality is only from modern times, and I don't see how it conflicts with what I said, and it was never my intention and as I said it doesn't conflict with what I said, and I stand by both assertions.

It's fine. That is why i asked.
For me it sounded like that todays media was the reason for people to be aroused from the same gender.

Today's media is a reason for people to be aroused from the same gender. It's obviously not the only reason.