Quote from: antonio8 on November 10, 2015, 12:22:05 AM

Quote from: TarzanSupplex on November 10, 2015, 12:18:52 AM

Quote from: antantti on November 10, 2015, 12:00:56 AM

Quote from: TarzanSupplex on November 08, 2015, 05:46:30 PM

My poor superclocked 950 can barely get 5400 KH while my overclocked 750 TI can get north of 5200 KH using much less power- is there any more data I can give you to help with dialing in the 950? Intensity for both seems to top out at 20.

There is nothing wrong with your 950 or your config. All 9-series maxwell gpus are poor in lyra2v2 performance compared to 7-series maxwell hash/w wise. 950/60 really suck because of their crippled 128-bit memory lane. Better mine some other algo with them.

980 TIs arent too bad- but I get what youre saying. I think there is some room for optimization on the 950 however- Its should be able to hang and outpace the 750 TI by a wider margin-

Usually I mine Quark- but the payrate has tanked as of late...

The 750ti will go down as "The little engine that could". For what they are capable of power wise they can't be beat. If the other Maxwell cards could give the same performance (hash per wattage per price).

thefarm is a complete gigabyte 750ti oc lp powerhouse ...

the amount of power expended for the hashrate - has been the best i have had in a VERY long time ...

i cant give you static figures - just bills ( which i will on refer to - not specify ) - but the power bills in comparison to when thefarm was completely running gigabyte 7970 / 20x oc cards is a HUGE difference ...

even though the hashrate is much lower in comparison to the amd cards - nvidia has about half of the hashrate at about one third of the electricity bills ...

and from where im standing ( and forking out my pocket from ) thats a damn good deal ...

the private kernels would make it that much more efficient also - if anyone was willing to make a deal on them ...

#crysx