Quote from: 2112 on November 10, 2015, 03:22:38 AM

I don't know the flags to the version of the BerkeleyDB included in your Linux distro. If it isn't exactly the same as your bitcoind then it isn't going to work until you rebuild all the db_* utilities with the exact same flags as used to build bitcoind.

I compiled db-4.8.30 by this (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-unix.md)

Quote

configure --enable-cxx --disable-shared --with-pic
make install

But I don't know about flags with my bitcoind was compiled. I just got bitcoind here https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.11.1/bitcoin-0.11.1-linux64.tar.gz

Quote from: 2112 on November 10, 2015, 03:22:38 AM

One thing that you obviously missed is that you quoted an output from the "list of databases" inside "wallet.dat". The actual Bitcoin wallet is inside that file within a database named "main".

Yes, "db_dump -l wallet.dat" ouput only "main".

Quote from: 2112 on November 10, 2015, 03:22:38 AM

The other thing that you missed is that if you get all versions and build flags of BerkeleyDB right you will be able to monitor everything inside wallet.dat live, without shutting down bitcoind. That is the whole point of the exercise!

It seems the flags is right. So what command line argument need for db_stat that it will show everything inside wallet.dat live?

Quote from: 2112 on November 10, 2015, 03:22:38 AM

Edit: Oh, and I just noticed one more thing: it is about 5am in Ukraine. Did you actually sleep tonight? This isn't a 5 minute job that any zombie can do, you need to be really awake and conscious.

Sometimes when I getting exciting challenge, I can not fall asleep for a long time )

Quote from: 2112 on November 10, 2015, 03:22:38 AM

Edit2: In another past post you've mentioned that you are using the built-in account functionality. The "accounts" in Bitcoin Core never worked right. They are now officially depreciated. Nobody is going to fix any performance bugs in that code. You can't easily fix those bug yourselves because the "accounts" were designed wrong and fixing them would require major rewrite. The only people who ever used built-in accounts were fraudsters and people who have absolutely no understanding of accounting. I presume you were just completely unfamiliar with accounting and that was why you used them.

So what the right way to use bitcoind in multiuser system without "accounts"?
Keep all users and they addresses in my one database (like mysql) and then just do "bitcoind sendfrom" for sending and catch "walletnotify" event for receiving? Is it right?

Quote from: 2112 on November 10, 2015, 03:22:38 AM

The only people who ever used built-in accounts were fraudsters and people who have absolutely no understanding of accounting. I presume you were just completely unfamiliar with accounting and that was why you used them.

When I was making design my project I haven't found any materials that would explain to me the right way, so I had to deal with Bitcoin Core API such as it is. Forgive me my illiteracy.