Quote from: dooglus on November 15, 2015, 04:11:58 PM

Quote from: Hippie Tech on November 15, 2015, 03:31:11 PM

Actually, the best way to fork, I mean fuck, Tongue

.. I mean fork the whales (namely SuperClam and Dooglus), would be to push the snapshot back 4-5 months. Wink

My share of the total active CLAM supply has been steadily shrinking over time due to dilution from the digger and the increase of the JD bankroll.

The further back you push the snapshot the better for my bottom line.

Quote from: Hippie Tech on November 15, 2015, 03:31:11 PM

This will put the kabosh on their easy/instamine, if they did salt the blockchain with hundreds of thier addys during the time leading up to launch.

I didn't hear about CLAM until after it had launched. I was able to dig some small (2 digit) number of addresses. Maybe 27 of them. Something like that.

Quote from: Hippie Tech on November 15, 2015, 03:31:11 PM

Name: SuperClam
Date Registered: April 26, 2014, 01:38:20 AM

CLAM snapshot : May 12, 2014

So the CLAM project account was created around the same time as the CLAM project itself? That's highly suspicious, eh?

Quote from: Hippie Tech on November 15, 2015, 03:31:11 PM

Is there anyway to prove if these giant diggers are single wallets with dozens of valid addys ?

How many addresses does each BTC, LTC and/or DOGE wallet.dat hold again ? Roll Eyes

Sites like walletexplorer.com attempt to answer such questions by analyzing which addresses appear together as inputs to a transaction. If A and B are inputs to a transaction it's likely that A and B are in the same wallet. If B and C are inputs to another transaction then it's likely that all 3 of A, B, and C are in the same wallet. walletexplorer.com applies this across the whole blockchain to partition the set of all addresses into "clusters" of addresses which it's likely belong to the same wallet. Using coinjoin it is possible to thwart such analysis and cause independent clusters to merge, but for the most part walletexplorer.com's analysis is probably accurate.

Most of the "whale digger" addresses appear to be in a cluster labelled "BetVIP.com" by one of the wallet explorer sites. I never heard of that site, and find it hard to believe it was big enough to have created 100k funded BTC addresses organically, but I've not spent much time researching the whale digger. It doesn't really matter who he is.

Pardon the delayed response ..

You must be a narcissistic basket case if you expect us to believe that you and/or whoever cloned this shit, was able to resist salting the snapshot with thousands of your cryptofiat addresses.

Are you and/or SuperClam the evil digger ?

You and your sock/shill parade will soon be exposed.