Quote from: ol92 on November 20, 2015, 11:59:29 AM

Quote from: rpietila on November 20, 2015, 10:47:26 AM

- official death toll (129) widely off from the "number of people who actually lost their life and are confirmed dead as a result" (seen 1, may be more)

I don't know for the other things, but you shouldn't make this claims for the number of people dead : there is a list of named people dead : some of them were somewhat puplic figures : teacher in university, owner of restaurants. Faking their death seems really difficult.

Well I am not a first-timer in these. It is a common occurrence that people claimed to be dead don't actually die. In US it happens often with the so-called shootings.

Yet, It is illogical to claim that people did not die, anyone claiming such does not know logic. (Same as I regard each and everyone claiming to know for sure there is no God, a patent fool with no logic).

But if people did die, there is a very easy way to know it, better than any official talk which time and again is lie: facebook profiles. Might someone be so kind as to show the 100 facebook profiles of the people that were, yet are no more. When journalists are killed in Middle East, their FB going dormant and newsfeed stopping is a proof of death. I mean it's terrible that people die, and disgusting to ask for proof, but in light of the whole thing being such as setup, it's just normal to be wary.

If I was a fool, I would also buy the "just a terrorist attack" story. Show me even one terrorist attack with no western/israel intelligence not planning, executing, at least knowing it for the last 25 years!! Roll Eyes

And let's turn the thread to its topic please - it is easy enough to define - a method to keep accessing an online site from a totally wiretapped environment (because that's what we have, but the bombing attacks are used to officially enable the powers to the controllers so that they can use them in everyday enforcement) without giving reusable info to anyone.