Quote from: dnaleor on November 22, 2015, 10:55:16 PM

Quote from: toknormal on November 22, 2015, 09:10:40 PM

Quote from: dnaleor on November 22, 2015, 08:37:33 PM

Tell me, why is it a good situation to have the wealth concentrated in 3400 wallets?
If I were you guys, I would like to see a lower MN count @ 1000 DASH and lobby for a lower threshold for setting up a MN.

Not every wallet is - or needs to be - owned by a single person. As I often point out, blockchains are not analogues of bank accounts, they are analogous of units of base value.

Right now, these economies are tiny. If they ever develop to anything like significant sizes then the correspondence between blockchain addresses and ownership will be even more ambigious. For example, there is gold stashed in vaults all over the world where the entire vault is not owned by a single person just because it happens to be at the same address.

The network requirement to collateralise a masternode is 1000 Dash. That requirement says nothing about it having to be funded by a single person. Unlike the fiat credit network, crypto and owners are decoupled - thats the whole point of it (in the same way that gold and owners are de-coupled).

So you suggest that grouping DASH is a good idea to increase masternodes.
This introduces counterparty risk and centralization.

great! (or not?)

Case in point from my post.

Logo - check.

Sigspam - check.

Panhandling shitcoin on Dash thread - check.

It's all love