Quote from: Carlton Banks on November 23, 2015, 06:26:09 PM

Quote from: Zarathustra on November 23, 2015, 06:20:00 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on November 23, 2015, 06:15:27 PM

Quote from: Zarathustra on November 23, 2015, 06:12:07 PM

How many times do you have to be told that the limit will be raised next year?? Do you understand? Not tonight dear! Next year! 2016!

Opinions of the outcome of the block-size issue? von nyeko_92 in btc

[]ForkiusMaximus 12 Punkte vor 19 Stunden

Either Core will implement a modest increase, like 2-4-8 (or Flexblocks), or they will be forked off.

Once that goes off without a hitch, many of the small block adherents' objections will be gone, and we can fork again as needed to raise it more.

And now you're presenting Adam Back's proposition as a victory for "big blockists"? Cheesy

You're out of your mind.

Luke, gmax and other miniblockists will have to compromize up at least to Adams numbers. And then:

Once that goes off without a hitch, many of the small block adherents' objections will be gone, and we can fork again as needed to raise it more.

It's slightly amazing how vindictive you're being, all while failing to admit how badly your argument has failed?

"Look at how successful we've been, the opposite of everything we've said so far has been demonstrated to be true!"

You're clearly unhinged in some way or another, and you're expecting to attract people to your argument, how, exactly?

Blablubb. What do you mean? I always said that core will be forced to raise the limit next year. To prolong the stalemate by talking about different 'proposals' will not work anymore into the halving period. Furthermore they will be forced to raise that limit as much that it will not block the stream. The community (market) will not tolerate a cap that is small enough to enforce the stream artificially into sidechains. As soon as that happens another fork will be enforced by the market.