Quote from: RealBitcoin on November 26, 2015, 12:26:40 AM

Quote from: ZephramC on November 12, 2015, 07:10:42 AM

RealBitcoin spoke about price of bitcoins expressed in fiat money.
If you mean prices (of just about anything) expressed in bitcoins then you are speaking about price deflation. This means that some consumers will hold off some of their spending. Whether this is bad or good thing can not be decided.
It depends where you put boundary between responsible saving and selfish hoarding. And where you put boundary between "only the best goods and investments should survive" and "economy and investment should be stimulated by gradually destroying value of people's money (bitcoins) and forcing them to spend and support consumption".

Think about situations and goods where prices go down (computers, smartphones, ...). Is it a healthy market? Would it be healthy market if prices went down much faster?

Hoarding = Insurance.

It is never evil to have supplies and reserves that could be used in an emergency.

Stupid keynesians wants us to have 0$ in our pocket and constantly take loans after loans. Its an evil economic theory.

I rather prefer to have 1 mountain of gold than to have 0$ in my pocket.

Some spending is necessary.. So maybe a hybrid system?