Quote from: smooth on November 29, 2015, 10:17:03 PM

Quote from: USB-S on November 29, 2015, 10:03:56 PM

Quote from: dooglus on November 29, 2015, 09:39:30 PM

Quote from: USB-S on November 29, 2015, 11:04:17 AM

By removing the core distribution process from clam, would kill this coin.

Yesterday Creative posted her draft "CLAMour" voting proposal, allowing the community to vote whether they want to change things like the distribution process. The coin didn't die.

However they didn't change the initial distribution method. Voting is just an extra feature to let community decide.

Some skepticism is warranted given the basic premise that you don't ask a question when you don't already have some expectation that you will like the answer. Someone decided to implement this feature and roll it out on an accelerated schedule. Consider what that implies.

I'm hopeful that the community (including some insiders who almost certainly own a lot of coins themselves) will rise to the occasion, stop being manipulated by FUDding short sellers, and leave the distribution alone.

My hope for the community is the same.

The distribution debate is much like the block size debate. In the end the community will most likely chose what's best for the coin to survive.

Gz on JD for making bank