Quote from: systh on November 30, 2015, 03:46:06 PM

Quote from: child_harold on November 30, 2015, 03:15:21 PM

Quote from: smooth on November 30, 2015, 03:07:58 PM

Quote from: child_harold on November 30, 2015, 01:35:00 PM

Quote from: othe on November 27, 2015, 02:48:07 PM

Quote from: Wanderlust on November 25, 2015, 08:34:51 PM

As above:
********

Oh and the invites to the private shadowmarket alpha are on offer
There will be no functional market till well into 2016 and Ethrreum just made Shadowsend in a few lines of script.
Welcome to November's End

**

What a load of bollox

If you read MRL0004 you might understand that you can´t just plugin a ringsig architecture without making it neccesary for everyone to use; Just pointing that out, whatever ETH adds it´s not the same if it´s not mandatory. The reason i point this out is just because there´s nothing worse in privacy solutions than snakeoil that makes people feel safe when they aren´t.

Nice try.

Vitalik and the ETH team just made a better shadowsend and we'll see how strict CN coins fare. My hunch: not so good.

No they didn't make a "better" shadowsend. They made a much more limited proof of concept that is totally impractical to use. Even shadowsend is better than that (I think), though it is true they share many of the same weaknesses.

Precisely. You "think". Before too long the documentation of the Ethereum offering will eclipse Shadow's efforts and earn trust through proper peer review etc

That's exactly the point. No docs > no review > no trust.

At least smooth says he "thinks". Everything you say in contrast is rock-solid truth, no matter the reality, right?
I can't wait for ETH review. Hopefully they'll have one or you'll go on a rampage again.

Quote from: child_harold on November 30, 2015, 03:17:13 PM

Quote from: systh on November 27, 2015, 08:10:18 PM

Quote from: box0214 on November 27, 2015, 07:04:34 PM

didnt shadow have a nice motherboard write up??? it looked legit, what happen? sorry i didnt read everything.

Yes, it does (have a write up). Yes, it is legit.

Go with either Motherboard article (or the DeepDotWeb one if you want) or you can trust the delusional chaos of mr. child_harold/Wanderlust (and his other alter-egos).

It is not that anybody should trust me, rather that they have little or no reason to trust YOU.
I have raised many valid points in this thread all of which have been summarily ignored. More fool you.

Ehm, excuse me? I'm not saying anybody to trust me, but why exactly they shouldn't? I'm not spitting BS all around.

The only things you raised are your delusional theories. For the proper questions, you've received many answers, over and over again (both here and in official Shadow ANN thread). But you decided to ignore those, so don't act like we ignore you.
Instead of accepting those answers, you go and again spam these delusions, waving (your favourite) "red flags", shouting "scam" etc.

Nobody wants to speak with you, when you're not willing to listen. Do you get it?
I'm just having a laugh from all of this. Hope you do too, otherwise I feel bad for you :]

A shitty white paper and no peer review 12 months after the commission

No Sir, I will not abide.

When I say YOU I mean the Team

When the CInnicoin community was lost and asking about ZK ryno quietly launched SDC.

Unforgivable IMO