Quote from: brg444 on November 30, 2015, 07:49:12 PM

Quote from: VeritasSapere on November 30, 2015, 07:25:50 PM

I think that some of these more fundamental questions like the blocksize for instance are more concerned with politics and economics then computer science, which is in part why I do not consider the Core developers fundamentally changing the economic policy of Bitcoin a good thing. You might have spend a lifetime studying computer science but there are other people that have spent a lifetime studying economics and politics that do disagree with you. The humanities are more concerned with the study of human culture, as oposed to more objective scientific facts which is what computer science is more involved with.

I do not consider you to be an expert on economics and politics, I most certainly do acknowlige you to be one of the best experts in the fields of computer science within Bitcoin. However sometimes it can be the case that engineers can awnser some questions very differently compared to schollars in different fields of thought. The engineers are not always correct, especially in fields that are not within their own area of expertise

So basically you're saying you choose to ignore scientific evidence and prefer to rely on confirmation bias by cherrypicking pseudo-scientific (politics, economics) arguments that fits your "ideology".

You're a goddamned lunatic.

Scholars didnt came up with bitcoin.

Cypherpunks did.